WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE vs FIRE-ROASTED CHIPOTLE MUSTARD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FIRE-ROASTED CHIPOTLE MUSTARD wins in 2 out of 11 nutrient categories
WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE: 0
vs
FIRE-ROASTED CHIPOTLE MUSTARD: 2
(9 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE | FIRE-ROASTED CHIPOTLE MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 cal | 100 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 20 g | 20 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE | FIRE-ROASTED CHIPOTLE MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 48 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE | FIRE-ROASTED CHIPOTLE MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,100 MG | 1,200 MG |