WISCONSIN ROLL WR vs OKLAHOMA ROLL WR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
WISCONSIN ROLL WR: 0
vs
OKLAHOMA ROLL WR: 0
(10 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WISCONSIN ROLL WR | OKLAHOMA ROLL WR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 159 cal | 159 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 3.9 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 22.5 g | 22.5 g | Tie |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 6.3 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 2.8 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WISCONSIN ROLL WR | OKLAHOMA ROLL WR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.5 MG | 2.5 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WISCONSIN ROLL WR | OKLAHOMA ROLL WR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 14 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 1.0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 385 MG | 385 MG | Tie |