WILD PINK SALMON vs SLICED COOKED CONCH SCUNGILLI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLICED COOKED CONCH SCUNGILLI wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD PINK SALMON: 3
vs
SLICED COOKED CONCH SCUNGILLI: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD PINK SALMON | SLICED COOKED CONCH SCUNGILLI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 95 cal | 82 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 16.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD PINK SALMON | SLICED COOKED CONCH SCUNGILLI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD PINK SALMON | SLICED COOKED CONCH SCUNGILLI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 159 MG | 73 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 381 MG | 309 MG |