WILD PACIFIC PINK SALMON vs MACKEREL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD PACIFIC PINK SALMON: 2
vs
MACKEREL: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD PACIFIC PINK SALMON | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 cal | 158 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 22.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 5.4 g | 7.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD PACIFIC PINK SALMON | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD PACIFIC PINK SALMON | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 439 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 304 MG | 491 MG |