WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON vs GRILLING SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GRILLING SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON: 3
vs
GRILLING SHRIMP: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON | GRILLING SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 22.1 g | 12.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON | GRILLING SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON | GRILLING SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 12 MG | 53 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 499 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 80 MG | 238,938 MG |