WILD CAUGHT SKIN-ON FILLETS SNAPPER vs TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT SKIN-ON FILLETS SNAPPER: 2
vs
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT SKIN-ON FILLETS SNAPPER | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 96 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT SKIN-ON FILLETS SNAPPER | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT SKIN-ON FILLETS SNAPPER | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 224 MG |