WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS vs MEDIUM COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MEDIUM COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP wins in 3 out of 12 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS: 2
vs
MEDIUM COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | MEDIUM COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 53 cal | 59 cal | |
| Protein | 9.7 g | 14.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | MEDIUM COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | MEDIUM COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 91 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 434 MG | 353 MG |