WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET vs TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 2
vs
TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 86 cal | 94 cal | |
| Protein | 19.2 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 132 MG | 224 MG |