WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET vs GULF WILD-CAUGHT WHITE SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GULF WILD-CAUGHT WHITE SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 2
vs
GULF WILD-CAUGHT WHITE SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | GULF WILD-CAUGHT WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 86 cal | 88 cal | |
| Protein | 19.2 g | 20.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | GULF WILD-CAUGHT WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 62 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 265 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 132 MG | 119 MG |