WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET vs WILD CAUGHT BONELESS & SKINLESS HADDOCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT BONELESS & SKINLESS HADDOCK wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 3
vs
WILD CAUGHT BONELESS & SKINLESS HADDOCK: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | WILD CAUGHT BONELESS & SKINLESS HADDOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 86 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 19.2 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | WILD CAUGHT BONELESS & SKINLESS HADDOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | WILD CAUGHT BONELESS & SKINLESS HADDOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 288 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 132 MG | 214 MG |