WILD CAUGHT BONELESS & SKINLESS HADDOCK vs ALASKA COD FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT BONELESS & SKINLESS HADDOCK wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT BONELESS & SKINLESS HADDOCK: 4
vs
ALASKA COD FILLETS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT BONELESS & SKINLESS HADDOCK | ALASKA COD FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 77 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 18.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT BONELESS & SKINLESS HADDOCK | ALASKA COD FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT BONELESS & SKINLESS HADDOCK | ALASKA COD FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 288 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 214 MG | 71 MG |