WILD ARGENTINE PINK SHRIMP vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD ARGENTINE PINK SHRIMP: 3
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD ARGENTINE PINK SHRIMP | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 118 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 22.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD ARGENTINE PINK SHRIMP | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD ARGENTINE PINK SHRIMP | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 91 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 169 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 239 MG | 412 MG |