WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON vs CHOPPED CLAMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOPPED CLAMS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON: 1
vs
CHOPPED CLAMS: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON | CHOPPED CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 15.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON | CHOPPED CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 57 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 514 MG |