WHOLE SNAPPER vs TAIL-ON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL-ON wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHOLE SNAPPER: 1
vs
TAIL-ON: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHOLE SNAPPER | TAIL-ON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 82 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 16.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHOLE SNAPPER | TAIL-ON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHOLE SNAPPER | TAIL-ON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 47 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 376 MG |