WHOLE ROASTED CHICKEN vs SLOW-ROASTED PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW-ROASTED PORK wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WHOLE ROASTED CHICKEN: 4
vs
SLOW-ROASTED PORK: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHOLE ROASTED CHICKEN | SLOW-ROASTED PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 179 cal | 136 cal | |
| Protein | 23.8 g | 13.6 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 4.3 g | |
| Fat | 9.5 g | 6.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHOLE ROASTED CHICKEN | SLOW-ROASTED PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 3.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHOLE ROASTED CHICKEN | SLOW-ROASTED PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 161 MG | 414 MG |