WHOLE ALMONDS vs EMERALD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHOLE ALMONDS: 3
vs
EMERALD: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHOLE ALMONDS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 588 cal | 565 cal | |
| Protein | 20.6 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 20.6 g | 23.5 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 47.1 g | |
| Fiber | 11.8 g | 11.8 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHOLE ALMONDS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHOLE ALMONDS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 235 MG | 235 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 4.2 MG | 3.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 706 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 635 MG |