WHOLE ALMONDS vs BING CHERRIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BING CHERRIES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHOLE ALMONDS: 4
vs
BING CHERRIES: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHOLE ALMONDS | BING CHERRIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 607 cal | 523 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 6.8 g | |
| Carbs | 21.4 g | 56.8 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 29.6 g | |
| Fiber | 14.3 g | 2.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHOLE ALMONDS | BING CHERRIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 8.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHOLE ALMONDS | BING CHERRIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 182 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 750 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 91 MG |