WHITE ROSE vs BUNFULL BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE ROSE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHITE ROSE: 5
vs
BUNFULL BEEF FRANKS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE ROSE | BUNFULL BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 15.6 g | 12 g | |
| Carbs | 2.2 g | 4 g | |
| Fat | 7.8 g | 26 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE ROSE | BUNFULL BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE ROSE | BUNFULL BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 289 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 578 MG | 1,200 MG |