WHITE HAMBURGERS ROLLS vs RUSTIC POTATO SOURDOUGH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE HAMBURGERS ROLLS wins in 8 out of 14 nutrient categories
WHITE HAMBURGERS ROLLS: 8
vs
RUSTIC POTATO SOURDOUGH: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE HAMBURGERS ROLLS | RUSTIC POTATO SOURDOUGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 256 cal | 304 cal | |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 8.9 g | |
| Carbs | 46.5 g | 64.3 g | |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE HAMBURGERS ROLLS | RUSTIC POTATO SOURDOUGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 4.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE HAMBURGERS ROLLS | RUSTIC POTATO SOURDOUGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 93 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 161 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 488 MG | 696 MG |