WHITE DRY COOKING WINE vs HAM GLAZE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HAM GLAZE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
WHITE DRY COOKING WINE: 2
vs
HAM GLAZE: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE DRY COOKING WINE | HAM GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 cal | 162 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 40.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE DRY COOKING WINE | HAM GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 8 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 105 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 633 MG | 703 MG |