WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES vs ORIGINAL GRAHAMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL GRAHAMS wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES: 1
vs
ORIGINAL GRAHAMS: 8
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES | ORIGINAL GRAHAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 471 cal | 419 cal | |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 6.5 g | |
| Carbs | 64.7 g | 77.4 g | |
| Fat | 20.6 g | 11.3 g | |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES | ORIGINAL GRAHAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES | ORIGINAL GRAHAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 59 MG | 65 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 194 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 412 MG | 548 MG |