WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING vs COLESLAW DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING: 7
vs
COLESLAW DRESSING: 0
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 367 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 14.3 g | 30 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 7 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 14.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 39 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 500 MG | 433 MG |