WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING vs TUSCAN DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING: 5
vs
TUSCAN DRESSING: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING | TUSCAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 667 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 63.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING | TUSCAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING | TUSCAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 400 MG |