WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING vs DRESSING AND DIP CLASSIC CAESAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING AND DIP CLASSIC CAESAR wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING: 2
vs
DRESSING AND DIP CLASSIC CAESAR: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING | DRESSING AND DIP CLASSIC CAESAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 310 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 13.8 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 31.0 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING | DRESSING AND DIP CLASSIC CAESAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING | DRESSING AND DIP CLASSIC CAESAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 759 MG | 1,267 MG |