WHIPPED DRESSING SQUEEZABLE vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
WHIPPED DRESSING SQUEEZABLE: 1
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 6
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHIPPED DRESSING SQUEEZABLE | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 14.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 26.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHIPPED DRESSING SQUEEZABLE | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHIPPED DRESSING SQUEEZABLE | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 83 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 714 MG | 900 MG |