WHIPPED DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHIPPED DRESSING: 2
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHIPPED DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 552 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 58.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHIPPED DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHIPPED DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 633 MG | 724 MG |