WHIPPED DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHIPPED DRESSING: 2
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHIPPED DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 419 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.3 g | |
| Carbs | 14.3 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 44.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHIPPED DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHIPPED DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 81 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 714 MG | 907 MG |