WATER ADDED CHOPPED HAM vs CHICKEN BOLOGNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN BOLOGNA wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WATER ADDED CHOPPED HAM: 2
vs
CHICKEN BOLOGNA: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WATER ADDED CHOPPED HAM | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 235 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 8.8 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 8.8 g | |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 14.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WATER ADDED CHOPPED HAM | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WATER ADDED CHOPPED HAM | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,179 MG | 1,235 MG |