VALENTINE POPS vs PUMPKIN FUDGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PUMPKIN FUDGE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
VALENTINE POPS: 2
vs
PUMPKIN FUDGE: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | VALENTINE POPS | PUMPKIN FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 87.5 g | 69.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | VALENTINE POPS | PUMPKIN FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | VALENTINE POPS | PUMPKIN FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 95 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 167 MG |