UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM vs BLACK FOREST HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM: 4
vs
BLACK FOREST HAM: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | BLACK FOREST HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 109 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | BLACK FOREST HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | BLACK FOREST HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 356 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 764 MG | 804 MG |