UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM vs WILSON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILSON wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM: 3
vs
WILSON: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | WILSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 464 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 21.4 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | WILSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | WILSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 188 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 786 MG | 1,679 MG |