UNCURED GENOA SALAMI vs SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED GENOA SALAMI wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
UNCURED GENOA SALAMI: 4
vs
SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED GENOA SALAMI | SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 438 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 21.9 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 37.5 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED GENOA SALAMI | SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED GENOA SALAMI | SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 294 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,719 MG | 554 MG |