UNCURED BEEF FRANKS vs CHICKEN FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
UNCURED BEEF FRANKS: 3
vs
CHICKEN FRANKS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 340 cal | 209 cal | |
| Protein | 11.3 g | 14.0 g | |
| Carbs | 7.6 g | 7.0 g | |
| Fat | 28.3 g | 14.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 434 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 962 MG | 1,093 MG |