UNCURED BEEF FRANKS vs TRADITIONAL SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL SAUSAGE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
UNCURED BEEF FRANKS: 3
vs
TRADITIONAL SAUSAGE: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | TRADITIONAL SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 265 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 12.4 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 23.0 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | TRADITIONAL SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | TRADITIONAL SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 823 MG | 786 MG |