UNCURED BEEF FRANKS vs RED HOT LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED HOT LINKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
UNCURED BEEF FRANKS: 4
vs
RED HOT LINKS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | RED HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 340 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 11.3 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 7.6 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 28.3 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | RED HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | RED HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 434 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 962 MG | 1,607 MG |