UNCURED BEEF FRANKFURTER vs RING KISHKA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RING KISHKA wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
UNCURED BEEF FRANKFURTER: 3
vs
RING KISHKA: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED BEEF FRANKFURTER | RING KISHKA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED BEEF FRANKFURTER | RING KISHKA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED BEEF FRANKFURTER | RING KISHKA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 9.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 1,321 MG |