UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP vs BATTERED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP: 5
vs
BATTERED SHRIMP: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP | BATTERED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 53 cal | 247 cal | |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 11.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 12.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP | BATTERED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP | BATTERED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 646 MG | 235 MG |