UMAMI BAKED CHICKPEA THINS vs CAPE COD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UMAMI BAKED CHICKPEA THINS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
UMAMI BAKED CHICKPEA THINS: 6
vs
CAPE COD: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UMAMI BAKED CHICKPEA THINS | CAPE COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 500 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 60.7 g | 64.3 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 21.4 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UMAMI BAKED CHICKPEA THINS | CAPE COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 64.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | UMAMI BAKED CHICKPEA THINS | CAPE COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 571 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,179 MG | 446 MG |