TWIN BARS vs MEAL REPLACEMENT COOKIE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MEAL REPLACEMENT COOKIE wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
TWIN BARS: 0
vs
MEAL REPLACEMENT COOKIE: 8
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TWIN BARS | MEAL REPLACEMENT COOKIE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 558 cal | 424 cal | |
| Protein | 4.7 g | 12.1 g | |
| Carbs | 55.8 g | 45.5 g | |
| Fat | 37.2 g | 27.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 9.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TWIN BARS | MEAL REPLACEMENT COOKIE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TWIN BARS | MEAL REPLACEMENT COOKIE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 121 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 8.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 93 MG | 424 MG |