TUSCAN WHITE BEAN vs COOKED WILD RICE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED WILD RICE wins in 9 out of 18 nutrient categories
TUSCAN WHITE BEAN: 8
vs
COOKED WILD RICE: 9
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUSCAN WHITE BEAN | COOKED WILD RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 60 cal | 86 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 5.3 g | 18.6 g | |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 1.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUSCAN WHITE BEAN | COOKED WILD RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.0 MG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 17.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUSCAN WHITE BEAN | COOKED WILD RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 13 MG | 0 MG | |
| Copper, Cu | 0 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 0 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 11 MG | |
| Phosphorus, P | 0 MG | 57 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 48 MG | 29 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 45 MG | 357 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 0 MG | 0.9 MG |