TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS vs LOW SODIUM SMALL WHITE BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOW SODIUM SMALL WHITE BEANS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS: 3
vs
LOW SODIUM SMALL WHITE BEANS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS | LOW SODIUM SMALL WHITE BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 85 cal | 90 cal | |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 5.7 g | |
| Carbs | 13.9 g | 16.4 g | |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 6.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS | LOW SODIUM SMALL WHITE BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS | LOW SODIUM SMALL WHITE BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 38 MG | 48 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 300 MG | 404 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 308 MG | 111 MG |