TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS vs CLASSIC SLOW COOKED BAKED BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC SLOW COOKED BAKED BEANS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS: 3
vs
CLASSIC SLOW COOKED BAKED BEANS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS | CLASSIC SLOW COOKED BAKED BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 85 cal | 122 cal | |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 6.1 g | |
| Carbs | 13.9 g | 23.7 g | |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 6.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS | CLASSIC SLOW COOKED BAKED BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS | CLASSIC SLOW COOKED BAKED BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 38 MG | 46 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 300 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 308 MG | 336 MG |