TUNA STEAKS vs WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TUNA STEAKS: 2
vs
WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUNA STEAKS | WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 22.3 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUNA STEAKS | WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUNA STEAKS | WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 286 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 36 MG | 67 MG |