TUNA POKE CUBES vs 8/10 OZ HADDOCK FIL S/PK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
8/10 OZ HADDOCK FIL S/PK wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
TUNA POKE CUBES: 3
vs
8/10 OZ HADDOCK FIL S/PK: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUNA POKE CUBES | 8/10 OZ HADDOCK FIL S/PK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 23.9 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUNA POKE CUBES | 8/10 OZ HADDOCK FIL S/PK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUNA POKE CUBES | 8/10 OZ HADDOCK FIL S/PK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 442 MG | 286 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 44 MG | 214 MG |