TUNA LOVER COMBO vs OKLAHOMA ROLL WR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
TUNA LOVER COMBO: 5
vs
OKLAHOMA ROLL WR: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUNA LOVER COMBO | OKLAHOMA ROLL WR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 117 cal | 159 cal | |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 3.9 g | |
| Carbs | 18.1 g | 22.5 g | |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 6.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 2.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUNA LOVER COMBO | OKLAHOMA ROLL WR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUNA LOVER COMBO | OKLAHOMA ROLL WR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 8 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 14 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 218 MG | 385 MG |