TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS vs TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS: 5
vs
TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS | TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 85 cal | 85 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 3.9 g | |
| Carbs | 12.3 g | 13.9 g | |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 5.4 g | 3.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS | TUSCAN CANNELLINI BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 27 MG | 38 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 231 MG | 300 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 392 MG | 308 MG |