TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING vs SQUEEZE WHIPPED DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING: 3
vs
SQUEEZE WHIPPED DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING | SQUEEZE WHIPPED DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 333 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING | SQUEEZE WHIPPED DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 7 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,100 MG | 800 MG |