TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING vs DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING: 2
vs
DRESSING: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,100 MG | 1,133 MG |