TORN & GLASSER vs WHOLE ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHOLE ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TORN & GLASSER: 0
vs
WHOLE ALMONDS: 6
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TORN & GLASSER | WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 575 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 22.5 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 50 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 12.5 g | 13.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TORN & GLASSER | WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TORN & GLASSER | WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 250 MG | 267 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 3.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 733 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |