TORN & GLASSER vs SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TORN & GLASSER wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TORN & GLASSER: 5
vs
SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TORN & GLASSER | SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 316 cal | 67 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 1.1 g | |
| Carbs | 73.7 g | 15.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 5.3 g | 1.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TORN & GLASSER | SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 15.8 MG | 13.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TORN & GLASSER | SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 133 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |